Fwd: MORE PP or READER'S CHOICE?

-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, May 15, 2013 4:11 pm
Subject: MORE PP or READER'S CHOICE?

 

      "Reasonable people adjust to the world; Unreasonable

       people try to change it."*

                                        -H.G. Wells

                         PANDORA's PRETTY BOX - Part Three

                                                     or

     READER's CHOICE (Reader Choose Title as Calliope is Too Busy)

                      ARE SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES BIGOTS?

                                                     or

                              BIGGEST THREAT:      or Brown?

                                                     or

                   MORE SHOTS HEARD 'ROUND the WORLD!

                                                     or

         SELECT ONE of THESE or CHOOSE ONE of YOUR OWN

                       (after all, we do live in a semi-free country)

 

The CJCS Comsats Pledge (Pinder, Olympia, 5th Century): Aletheia who art

the beginning of the great virtue , keep my good-faith from stumbling against

rough falsehood."

(Reminder: Please tell family members, friends and co-workers about CJCS

Comsats listed at Facebook's Second American Revolution. Our AddThis

numbers are in dire need of improvement: please email articles of all

ages to those with whom you are still on speaking terms).

 

FOX NEWS ALERT: "Zeus not completely satisfied with statement issued

by RD in "Back to Plato's Cave: A Hermes/Urania Joint at

www.comsat-ak.blogspot.com over the 'G' word. RD properly pointed out

that God when making reference to the God of the Abrahamic religions is

customarily capitalized but not when referring to the gods of ancient

religions (now, called mythologies). We don't have all the details but at

least one reliable source tells FOX that there was an indoor lightning bolt

at RD's residence. We will keep you posted on any and all developments.

Note: You won't completely ascertain what we are talking about until "Hermes/

Urania Joint - Part Two" is posted. You are glimpsing the future.

And, now back to Red Eye in progress. Sorry, GG."

 

Before you think that those of us at CJCS Comsats have taken leave of our

senses (Momus: "You took leave a long time ago." Dr. Watson: "I fully

concur with you diagnosis. Just kidding. The staff here where Sherlock and

I have had the pleasure of contributing have been more than courteous and

accommodating. Further, RD is having problems with Zeus, I don't want to have

problems with RD. Can Moriarty be believed? He thinks that RD has a

surface-to-surface short range missile and an ICBM."), please, read or reread

'Second Amendment Under Attack' at PP's Box - Part 2.

(Nota Bene': our articles are written for the vast majority of Americans who

are Moderates and Conservatives. Too bad they aren't the ones controlling

USA!!!).

      We have been talking about why the vast majority of our Founding Fathers

(we so enjoy employing that term for it incenses libs in general and feminists

in particular; they prefer Framers --- only use when referring to 'em in a painting

 on a wall. Leave your PC outside the hatch of our five comsats!) and why they

wouldn't want Uncle Sam to know who owned guns, how many and what type.

On the other hand, they were concerned with public safety. It might seem an

impossible task: balancing Constitution, Public Safety and the intent of

virtually all Founding Dads on this explosive issue!

      Ponder This: Two Perspectives: A) "Earth Revealed" (PBS/

CUNY) - In this doc series that argue that new fed regs are necessitated in

order to assure that new structures are more earthquake-proof and that older

structures are retrofitted. Implementing and enforcing new regs cost money.

Why should you foot the bill if you are smart enough not to live or open your

business in very earthquake-prone areas? Why shouldn't it be the responsibly

of the contractor and the future owner or the present owner of an existing

structure? Do away with fed or fed and state or fed and state and local regs!

The individual should meet what is recommended as minimal or choose how

far beyond the minimum he chooses to go. Incentive? It would effect the size

of interest on mortgage and on property owner's insurance. We contend that

most Americans are concerned with the safety of their family or workers/

customers. They don't need Big Brother telling them what's what. They need

geologists, architects, bankers and insurers. Perhaps, you prefer to retain

existing regs, while we don't, but certainly not more!; {Is CJ A.D.D.-ing? Let's see

if there is method to his perceived madness}  B) "Endless Voyage" (PBS/

CUNY) takes the converse position --- As refreshing as an ocean breeze.

Ecologists, oceanographers and marine biologists are concerned with threats

to species of marine life. The want sanctuaries where for periods of time no

fishing or fishing for certain species are banned for fear of extinction. Fisherman

care about marine life but also want to make $$$s to support their families.

And, think that mist of these scientists are exaggerating the numbers too

secure greater protections than are required (Reminiscent of U.N. scientists

being caught in 2006 cooking the books on global heating. These are what are

known as bad scientists with political, as opposed to, scientific agendas -

deserving to be spanked with their test tubes, especially, the female of the

species! We have written extensively on this, including, "Green with Envy" at

www.pan-multiverse.blogspot.com ). Many of these bad scientists work for

the EPA. When negotiations between the EPA and the fisherman transpire -

the BIG fish at EPA usually get everything their insatiable whale-size

appetites for regs want. BIG gov prevails! To make matters worse, politicians

bailout failing fisherman, who would otherwise go out of business, with

subsidies. (We oppose virtually all forms of subsidies and only favor subsidies for

basic {pure science) research plus pharmaceutical}. Maybe, just maybe, fewer regs

 would be needed if there were fewer fisherman. Of course, we're dealing with

 ravenous EPA bureaucrats!). According to 'Endless' when the fisherman, local

gov officials, members of community groups and local experts powwow the

 outcome is often different with everyone winning and losing points but feeling

that agreement arrived at is fair and satisfactory. We say the further away and the

 less involved fed gov --- the better!!!! (See "BO Offends" and Article Upside Down"

at this venue).

      In the lib-biased (BIG gov creates heaven on earth) PBS series "Constitution,

USA," one segment gets it right: If you don't like the laws being passed by your

state legislature and the regs being created by unelected bureaucrats in the state's

executive branch, you can pack up and move to another state but if you abhor

what your Uncle Sam is doing, you must grin and bare it or leave your USA. Fed

gov gives you a choice --- Hobson's Choice.

     Clearly, the George Gang didn't want a lot of laws and wouldn't tolerate regs

(See: "Why Regulatory Laws are Unconstitutional: at

www.cj-rickaddsite.blogspot.com If you can't connect directly, everyone can connect

via Facebook's Second American Revolution). They wanted local gov to do the

most but little, followed by state and fed gov the least. Fed gov suffers from a one-

size-fits-all mentality. Anytime that they perceive a problem that want to jump in:

even regulating water pressure in toilets where we wish that they would jump in!

Now for the issue in the table...The FBI's database is supplied by the National

Instant Background Check and The National Crime Information Center, by

states, by mental institutions, by family members, local police, etc. and is

largely voluntary. BO wants to make mandatory. FBI mostly has names and

addresses of gun owners and only a partial list that also contains make, model

and serial number; BO wants a complete list. This violates intent of Founding

Fathers.

      Each state should decide what disqualifies someone from owning a firearm

and should have a state registry of preferably just names and addresses but

model, make and serial number if the state so wishes but really isn't states 

business. Cooperation: if someone commits fed crime, state should supply info it

has on the individual, as well as, share with another state.

     There should be no limits on assault or semi-assaults weapons by fed gov

 (unless a state so chooses and we hope that they don't so choose; state must make

 sure that banned weapons don't enter their state with FBI assistance). because

 it would only effect law-abiding citizens not criminals and once libs start with limits

 their list will expand: give them an a inch and they'll go the whole nine yards!

(nine yards, how appropriate, was originally a term regarding ammunition.

     State militias are controlled solely by governor (not governor and president

like National Guard) and are largely inactive. they should be rejuvenated:

symbolic action would be reassuring to many, If not most, Americans. Nowadays,

 It  would be virtually impossible for the citizenry or a state to conduct a revolution

against fed gov. Although, it is out-of-control with laws and regs unconstitutional.

BIG fed gov began around 1900, accelerated in the '30s, 60s and under BO.

The freedom and liberty of citizens and businesses is vanishing. The problem

arose because of lib misinterpretations of "the general welfare of the people" in

the Constitution and the 'Commerce Clause. They think that it means that fed

gov can get involved with anything it chooses beyond the list of powers and

responsibilities listed for it in the Constitution and that it isn't limited to regulating

trade between the states but can regulate trade and anything else within a

state that even remotely or indirectly effects another state or the whole nation.

What the FFs meant was the fed gov was limited to those areas listed unless:

A) It effected virtually all Americans and B) it couldn't be handled at the state

level. Fed gov shouldn't be involved with education, transportation, housing, etc.

 but should be involved with space exploration --- it's hard too justify its

involvement in things other than those listed: defense; making money; foreign

 policy; and trade, just trade, between U.S. and foreign nations and state-to-state.

When they get involved where they don't belong they make matters worse.

(We are no longer free and no longer live in a capitalist nation: when BO took

office fed gov controlled 18% of economy - when he leaves 35%!!!).

      It's fascinating that 33% of Americans, according to a Heritage Foundation

Poll, believe that an armed revolution against Uncle Sam will be necessary

within the next few years. We think that they are crazy. Uncle is too BIG and

powerful! Citizens and states would have to cry: "Uncle!"

                                      ATHENA Agrees; ARES Doesn't

    Sometimes you feel like a nut and sometimes you don't. Peter Paul has

       nuts and Mounds don't. Nonetheless, the principle still has currency

         (It is true that Aphrodite was in love with Ares but that was a long.

                              long, long time ago. She's with RD now!).

The CJCS CHALLENGE...We contend that there is a difference between bigotry

(being against a group for no good reason: pure ignorance and being a truth-teller.

CJ has been accused a bigotry regarding illegals, homos, women-in-uniform,

blacks, Muslims and more. We challenge you to read our very recent, recent and

older posts and then call us bigots.

       is it bigotry to want all Americans to embrace Western Civilization, including,

American Branch (melting pot ) as best for our nation and opposing multi-culturalism

as derisive.

       We hate neo-Nazi  skin heads and white supremacists. It is bigotry to point out

the Hispanic gangs comprised of citizens and illegals are a far bigger threat to

public safety? Or, pointing out how homos are immoral/abnormal/unnatural

predicated on science and religion. It is ignorant to speak in terms of facts regarding

the mistreatment of Christianity and the accommodation of Islam in the U.S. military.

And, how national security is being threatened by women playing soldier. Or, being

opposed to Islam destruction of Americana in a small towns. When you have facts,

you can oppose a group. It doesn't constitute bigotry. Is it culturally-intolerant to point

out differences between  Occidentals and Orientals (Non-PC term - that's why we use

it!) predicated on psychological research? Or, to refer to Latino IQs? To say that we are

 moving away from liberty and capitalism is just plain truth-telling. We back up

everything at our five comsats - check out new and older posts for yourself.

(Please see: "Ah Puch" and "Erida" and oldie but goody "Why Such Great Anger in

Those Heavenly Minds.").

        Social conservatives favor traditional morality and patriotism as do most

moderates. And, most aren't religious extremist. Deist CJ fuckin' isn't.

       The Biggest threat that we face is from within: BIG gov, libs and groups that

don't put America first and whose presence is causing its disintegration.

       Sadly, BO will go down in history as one of that small group of presidents who

profoundly reshaped America --- he has done it in foreign and military policies,

social policy and domestic policies, including, economics. We can truly thank him

for our living in the Union of Secular Socialist States of America!

    Sherlock, I'd put it this way: "Eliminate all other factors, and the one that remains

                                                 must be the truth."

(*While it is unlikely that that which BO has done can be undone, we must still try.

 Get the Continental Army uniforms out of mothballs and let's do ourselves a SECOND
 AMERICAN REVOLUTION!!! Contact your members of congress and other

 office holders. They pay attention to those who phone, email and visit their

 offices for they know that these here are likely voters. Consider becoming a

 member of Judicial Watch and Alliance Defending Freedom (Strange

 Bedfellows: where members and we're deists).Please tell your friends about

our comsats and email them articles very recent, recent and older. Thank

you).