-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, May 15, 2013 4:11 pm
Subject: MORE PP or READER'S CHOICE?
"Reasonable people adjust to the world; Unreasonable
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, May 15, 2013 4:11 pm
Subject: MORE PP or READER'S CHOICE?
"Reasonable people adjust to the world; Unreasonable
people try to change it."*
-H.G. Wells
PANDORA's PRETTY BOX - Part Three
or
READER's CHOICE (Reader Choose Title as Calliope is Too Busy)
ARE SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES BIGOTS?
or
BIGGEST THREAT: or Brown?
or
MORE SHOTS HEARD 'ROUND the WORLD!
or
SELECT ONE of THESE or CHOOSE ONE of YOUR OWN
(after all, we do live in a semi-free country)
The CJCS Comsats Pledge (Pinder, Olympia, 5th Century): Aletheia who art
the beginning of the great virtue , keep my good-faith from stumbling against
rough falsehood."
(Reminder: Please tell family members, friends and co-workers about CJCS
Comsats listed at Facebook's Second American Revolution. Our AddThis
numbers are in dire need of improvement: please email articles of all
ages to those with whom you are still on speaking terms).
FOX NEWS ALERT: "Zeus not completely satisfied with statement issued
by RD in "Back to Plato's Cave: A Hermes/Urania Joint at
www.comsat-ak.blogspot.com over the 'G' word. RD properly pointed out
that God when making reference to the God of the Abrahamic religions is
customarily capitalized but not when referring to the gods of ancient
religions (now, called mythologies). We don't have all the details but at
least one reliable source tells FOX that there was an indoor lightning bolt
at RD's residence. We will keep you posted on any and all developments.
Note: You won't completely ascertain what we are talking about until "Hermes/
Urania Joint - Part Two" is posted. You are glimpsing the future.
And, now back to Red Eye in progress. Sorry, GG."
Before you think that those of us at CJCS Comsats have taken leave of our
senses (Momus: "You took leave a long time ago." Dr. Watson: "I fully
concur with you diagnosis. Just kidding. The staff here where Sherlock and
I have had the pleasure of contributing have been more than courteous and
accommodating. Further, RD is having problems with Zeus, I don't want to have
problems with RD. Can Moriarty be believed? He thinks that RD has a
surface-to-surface short range missile and an ICBM."), please, read or reread
'Second Amendment Under Attack' at PP's Box - Part 2.
(Nota Bene': our articles are written for the vast majority of Americans who
are Moderates and Conservatives. Too bad they aren't the ones controlling
USA!!!).
We have been talking about why the vast majority of our Founding Fathers
(we so enjoy employing that term for it incenses libs in general and feminists
in particular; they prefer Framers --- only use when referring to 'em in a painting
on a wall. Leave your PC outside the hatch of our five comsats!) and why they
wouldn't want Uncle Sam to know who owned guns, how many and what type.
On the other hand, they were concerned with public safety. It might seem an
impossible task: balancing Constitution, Public Safety and the intent of
virtually all Founding Dads on this explosive issue!
Ponder This: Two Perspectives: A) "Earth Revealed" (PBS/
CUNY) - In this doc series that argue that new fed regs are necessitated in
order to assure that new structures are more earthquake-proof and that older
structures are retrofitted. Implementing and enforcing new regs cost money.
Why should you foot the bill if you are smart enough not to live or open your
business in very earthquake-prone areas? Why shouldn't it be the responsibly
of the contractor and the future owner or the present owner of an existing
structure? Do away with fed or fed and state or fed and state and local regs!
The individual should meet what is recommended as minimal or choose how
far beyond the minimum he chooses to go. Incentive? It would effect the size
of interest on mortgage and on property owner's insurance. We contend that
most Americans are concerned with the safety of their family or workers/
customers. They don't need Big Brother telling them what's what. They need
geologists, architects, bankers and insurers. Perhaps, you prefer to retain
existing regs, while we don't, but certainly not more!; {Is CJ A.D.D.-ing? Let's see
if there is method to his perceived madness} B) "Endless Voyage" (PBS/
CUNY) takes the converse position --- As refreshing as an ocean breeze.
Ecologists, oceanographers and marine biologists are concerned with threats
to species of marine life. The want sanctuaries where for periods of time no
fishing or fishing for certain species are banned for fear of extinction. Fisherman
care about marine life but also want to make $$$s to support their families.
And, think that mist of these scientists are exaggerating the numbers too
secure greater protections than are required (Reminiscent of U.N. scientists
being caught in 2006 cooking the books on global heating. These are what are
known as bad scientists with political, as opposed to, scientific agendas -
deserving to be spanked with their test tubes, especially, the female of the
species! We have written extensively on this, including, "Green with Envy" at
www.pan-multiverse.blogspot.com ). Many of these bad scientists work for
the EPA. When negotiations between the EPA and the fisherman transpire -
the BIG fish at EPA usually get everything their insatiable whale-size
appetites for regs want. BIG gov prevails! To make matters worse, politicians
bailout failing fisherman, who would otherwise go out of business, with
subsidies. (We oppose virtually all forms of subsidies and only favor subsidies for
basic {pure science) research plus pharmaceutical}. Maybe, just maybe, fewer regs
would be needed if there were fewer fisherman. Of course, we're dealing with
ravenous EPA bureaucrats!). According to 'Endless' when the fisherman, local
gov officials, members of community groups and local experts powwow the
outcome is often different with everyone winning and losing points but feeling
that agreement arrived at is fair and satisfactory. We say the further away and the
less involved fed gov --- the better!!!! (See "BO Offends" and Article Upside Down"
at this venue).
In the lib-biased (BIG gov creates heaven on earth) PBS series "Constitution,
USA," one segment gets it right: If you don't like the laws being passed by your
state legislature and the regs being created by unelected bureaucrats in the state's
executive branch, you can pack up and move to another state but if you abhor
what your Uncle Sam is doing, you must grin and bare it or leave your USA. Fed
gov gives you a choice --- Hobson's Choice.
Clearly, the George Gang didn't want a lot of laws and wouldn't tolerate regs
(See: "Why Regulatory Laws are Unconstitutional: at
www.cj-rickaddsite.blogspot.com If you can't connect directly, everyone can connect
via Facebook's Second American Revolution). They wanted local gov to do the
most but little, followed by state and fed gov the least. Fed gov suffers from a one-
size-fits-all mentality. Anytime that they perceive a problem that want to jump in:
even regulating water pressure in toilets where we wish that they would jump in!
Now for the issue in the table...The FBI's database is supplied by the National
Instant Background Check and The National Crime Information Center, by
states, by mental institutions, by family members, local police, etc. and is
largely voluntary. BO wants to make mandatory. FBI mostly has names and
addresses of gun owners and only a partial list that also contains make, model
and serial number; BO wants a complete list. This violates intent of Founding
Fathers.
Each state should decide what disqualifies someone from owning a firearm
and should have a state registry of preferably just names and addresses but
model, make and serial number if the state so wishes but really isn't states
business. Cooperation: if someone commits fed crime, state should supply info it
has on the individual, as well as, share with another state.
There should be no limits on assault or semi-assaults weapons by fed gov
(unless a state so chooses and we hope that they don't so choose; state must make
sure that banned weapons don't enter their state with FBI assistance). because
it would only effect law-abiding citizens not criminals and once libs start with limits
their list will expand: give them an a inch and they'll go the whole nine yards!
(nine yards, how appropriate, was originally a term regarding ammunition.
State militias are controlled solely by governor (not governor and president
like National Guard) and are largely inactive. they should be rejuvenated:
symbolic action would be reassuring to many, If not most, Americans. Nowadays,
It would be virtually impossible for the citizenry or a state to conduct a revolution
against fed gov. Although, it is out-of-control with laws and regs unconstitutional.
BIG fed gov began around 1900, accelerated in the '30s, 60s and under BO.
The freedom and liberty of citizens and businesses is vanishing. The problem
arose because of lib misinterpretations of "the general welfare of the people" in
the Constitution and the 'Commerce Clause. They think that it means that fed
gov can get involved with anything it chooses beyond the list of powers and
responsibilities listed for it in the Constitution and that it isn't limited to regulating
trade between the states but can regulate trade and anything else within a
state that even remotely or indirectly effects another state or the whole nation.
What the FFs meant was the fed gov was limited to those areas listed unless:
A) It effected virtually all Americans and B) it couldn't be handled at the state
level. Fed gov shouldn't be involved with education, transportation, housing, etc.
but should be involved with space exploration --- it's hard too justify its
involvement in things other than those listed: defense; making money; foreign
policy; and trade, just trade, between U.S. and foreign nations and state-to-state.
When they get involved where they don't belong they make matters worse.
(We are no longer free and no longer live in a capitalist nation: when BO took
office fed gov controlled 18% of economy - when he leaves 35%!!!).
It's fascinating that 33% of Americans, according to a Heritage Foundation
Poll, believe that an armed revolution against Uncle Sam will be necessary
within the next few years. We think that they are crazy. Uncle is too BIG and
powerful! Citizens and states would have to cry: "Uncle!"
ATHENA Agrees; ARES Doesn't
Sometimes you feel like a nut and sometimes you don't. Peter Paul has
nuts and Mounds don't. Nonetheless, the principle still has currency
(It is true that Aphrodite was in love with Ares but that was a long.
long, long time ago. She's with RD now!).
The CJCS CHALLENGE...We contend that there is a difference between bigotry
(being against a group for no good reason: pure ignorance and being a truth-teller.
CJ has been accused a bigotry regarding illegals, homos, women-in-uniform,
blacks, Muslims and more. We challenge you to read our very recent, recent and
older posts and then call us bigots.
is it bigotry to want all Americans to embrace Western Civilization, including,
American Branch (melting pot ) as best for our nation and opposing multi-culturalism
as derisive.
We hate neo-Nazi skin heads and white supremacists. It is bigotry to point out
the Hispanic gangs comprised of citizens and illegals are a far bigger threat to
public safety? Or, pointing out how homos are immoral/abnormal/unnatural
predicated on science and religion. It is ignorant to speak in terms of facts regarding
the mistreatment of Christianity and the accommodation of Islam in the U.S. military.
And, how national security is being threatened by women playing soldier. Or, being
opposed to Islam destruction of Americana in a small towns. When you have facts,
you can oppose a group. It doesn't constitute bigotry. Is it culturally-intolerant to point
out differences between Occidentals and Orientals (Non-PC term - that's why we use
it!) predicated on psychological research? Or, to refer to Latino IQs? To say that we are
moving away from liberty and capitalism is just plain truth-telling. We back up
everything at our five comsats - check out new and older posts for yourself.
(Please see: "Ah Puch" and "Erida" and oldie but goody "Why Such Great Anger in
Those Heavenly Minds.").
Social conservatives favor traditional morality and patriotism as do most
moderates. And, most aren't religious extremist. Deist CJ fuckin' isn't.
The Biggest threat that we face is from within: BIG gov, libs and groups that
don't put America first and whose presence is causing its disintegration.
Sadly, BO will go down in history as one of that small group of presidents who
profoundly reshaped America --- he has done it in foreign and military policies,
social policy and domestic policies, including, economics. We can truly thank him
for our living in the Union of Secular Socialist States of America!
Sherlock, I'd put it this way: "Eliminate all other factors, and the one that remains
must be the truth."
(*While it is unlikely that that which BO has done can be undone, we must still try.
Get the Continental Army uniforms out of mothballs and let's do ourselves a SECOND
AMERICAN REVOLUTION!!! Contact your members of congress and other
AMERICAN REVOLUTION!!! Contact your members of congress and other
office holders. They pay attention to those who phone, email and visit their
offices for they know that these here are likely voters. Consider becoming a
member of Judicial Watch and Alliance Defending Freedom (Strange
Bedfellows: where members and we're deists).Please tell your friends about
our comsats and email them articles very recent, recent and older. Thank
you).
