Sunday, November 27, 2011

Fwd: Alfred Hitchcock Presents...



-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd3939@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 21, 2011 2:38 pm
Subject: Alfred Hitchcock Presents...

 Alfred Hitchcock Presents Second American Revolution Part 3 (Parts 2 & 1 follow)
                     by Citizen Journalist, Richard DePersio and Ho-Jon
 
Citizen Journalist: "This article is being taped before a live audience." Richard D."I'm
relieved that you chose to go with a live audience." Ho-Jon: "Why is an Englishman
presenting a Second American Revolution?" R.D.: He did become a U.S. citizen in 1956;
actually duel citizenship: he remained a subject (actually, they are subjects not citizens)
of the queen. The important thing being, he was making most of his money here and was
paying U.S. taxes upon become a citizen. Jolly good show. Pip, pip and all that bloody
good stuff. CJ: "I was remiss: it's being taped at the New Double Natural in Los Vegas."
R.D.: "You must be pleased. This is turning out to be a short preface; we haven't had one
of those in a long time." CJ: "I'm giddy!' R.D.: "Don't go sissy-boy on me!" Ho-Jon: "Can
I be an honorary Jew too?" CJ: "Yella, you gotta be kiddin'.
(Please see the two-part "Our Chosen People" at www.quasarpolitics.blogspot.com If you
have difficulty connecting directly, please connect via Facebook: Richard DePersio or
Twitter: @rickaddsite ).
 
   "The Constitution was once an instrument by which the objective rights of the
    individual to use and abuse their rights was generally secured. Now it is only
    am interesting intellectual challenge for bigthink sociologists who wrest from
    its Miltonic sweep and directness byzantine little sophisms that permit them
    to have their way in pioneering new civil rights, new prohibitions against public
    prayer, new electoral metaphysics (one man-one vote)...the Constitution is, at
    least temporarily, gone."
Was the above written yesterday? Last week? Last year? Shocker: it was written in 1966
by Bill Buckley ("Quotations from Chairman Bill: The Best of Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.,"
compiled by David Franke, Pocket Book, 1971).
Abortion became a right in 1973. By what contortions   did the U.S. Supreme Court find it
in the "Bill of Rights." !?!
        Our Founding Daddies considered Free Speech so precious and important that they
 placed it in Amendment One of the Bill of Rights. Further, they considered a particular right
 as something that a citizen could choose to exercise or not, abuse or not with very few
exceptions. The Constitution, including, the Bill of Rights existed to protect good people
from bad so that the good could pursue life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (property)
without interference from the bad nor from gov.
       Thirty years ago, limits on free speech began with harassment, especially, of the sexual
nature in the work place; ten years ago, the process of limiting on hate speech and bullying
began. Good things, you say. Gov doesn't posses constitutional authority to place such
limits anymore than it does to place limits on stupid or incorrect or silly speech. The
so-called 'victums' have the right to respond in kind or get someone to do it for them. Peer
pressure can curtail such speech but not gov but it is doing it! Private companies and clubs
can place limits on expression if they so choose.
Give libs an inch and they will take a mile...More recently, they are trying to bring back the
so-called "Equal Time" Doctrine to limit the free speech of conservatives on TV and Radio.
This is spite of the fact that they control most TV networks, newspapers, movie studios, record
companies, as well as, all public schools - elementary, high and college. Only 20% of
Americans identify themselves as libs; talk about minority rule and a virtual monopoly on
thought. (For more, please see: "Expanded: Potpourri" (New) at www.rickcmtsite.blogspot.com -
connect from Profile Page: Facebook: Richard DePersio; Twitter: @rickaddsite ).
      More recently:Crimes: Hate speech/hate crime - assault on property, bullying, verbal abuse/
insults, offensive graffiti/letters, etc. Unconstitutional   to punish a person for what they might have
been thinking. Charging someone with assault and a hate crime, defacing property and a hate
 crime, etc. Wrong! Just charge with assault, defacing, etc.
      More recently, Obama initiated process of seizing control of Internet (puddle in front of your
house not enough, see Part One). If he is not stopped, this will lead to curtailing free speech and
monitoring who says what. In the future, we might not be able to write what we are writing right
now! Isn't it fascinating that libs in general and, the most dangerous lib org in existence, ACLU
profess to protecting rights! Behavior Control and Police might be in our future. Watch you
manners for Big Brother is watching!
      Frivolous lawsuits: alleging sexual harassment for man complimenting you on your new
dress (a guy should be flattered by compliment) spilling coffee on oneself on McDonald's and
claiming that you didn't know that coffee was hot; being hugged by host of "Wheel of Fortune"
and three years later complaining of   back    pain and suing Pat and show's Executive Producer.
California (yes; they did something right; get smelling salts for audience members) and Texas
require plaintiff to pay defendant's legal costs if judge judges case as having been of a frivolous
nature. All states should do the self-same thing. Our Constitution guarantees us a right to a
speedy trial - a right frequently denied because of a heavy backlog of cases - - mostly, due to
frivolous lawsuits.
Alfred Hitchcock: "Let's daydream with our dear sponsor." An A.D.D. break sponsored by
Adderall and Sex on the Beach (vodka, peach schnapps, orange juice, cranberry juice -
International Bartender's Guide-Cocktails). We recommend Sex and the Beach plus
Adderall. CJ, a real man, has his Adderall with just vodka!
         Citizen Journalist corrects author of blunder book for blundering when it comes to
our good friend Dr. Watson (If truth be told, correction was submitted by him but CJ is taking
credit - it's what friends do).
   "Sir Arthur Canon Doyle: In 'A Study in Scarlet," Sherlock Holmes's assistant, Dr. Watson,
is said to have suffered a wartime bullet wound in the shoulder, but in "The Sign of Four,"
the wound is said to be in the leg." ("The Blunder Book," M. Hirsh Goldberg, Quill, 1984).
   In the "The Problem of Thor Bridge," Watson writes to Sherlock: "My dear Holmes, today,
I walked fourteen miles across rough terrain with hardly a twinge from leg or shoulder."
       Clearly our friend was shot twice in the same battle or in the shoulder in one battle and
the leg in another! Let's nitpick: ...Holmes's assistant...Holmes' would suffice. Overall, the
book was entertaining and informative. (RD: You can't put anything past CJ!).
AH: "Last commercial, one for the road, no doubt just as effective as drink {above}." Citizen
Journalist Comsats (web sites): for moderates, conservatives and out-to-lunch undecided...and
for the few open-minded libs willing to face the truth!
Upon seizing control of House, Republicans passed a bill requiring that all future House bills had to
come with an attachment justifying the legitimacy of the bill, Constitutionally Speaking. We are still
waiting for Dem-controlled Senate to do likewise. If you think that it will come to pass, you are to
ignorant to be exposing yourself to material of this nature!
Real Federalist/Constructionist/Judeo-Christian/Classical-Market-Liberal (audience members fainting
again - get smelling salts again - - or better yet: Adderall and vodka {charge 'em!}; early name for
capitalism: more than laissez  faire  lessthan tons of laws and regs in the version of today;capitalism
during the first hundred years or so of our nation) vs. bogus progressive/secular 'living' constitution.
This constituted one of our best live articles. You needn't flash 'Applaud' sign for our fans. Thanks for
coming and as Benny Hill says, "We'll see you again, real soon."
        
 
 
 
 



No comments:

Post a Comment