Second Sun-title: Bringing All Americans Together
by (the previously late) Richard DePersio and Citizen Journalist
We can make USA responsive to the wishes of those of all political stripes: Cs, Ms and Ls.
Members of the Supreme Court far removed from the U.S. Constitution not by time but
by ego. The self-aggrandized who believe that it is within the authority of 9 and their
authority alone to create America in their own warped image.
Just a few examples, please: removing prayer and Bible readings from public
schools in violation of the Constitution according to those who knew it best: The Composers:
The Founding Fathers.. (See: "Please Read Posts. Below concerning Children - first red
section at www.cj-rickaddsite.blogspot.com You might have to really search hard for this
comsat, as well as, pan-multi and quasar but well worth you time fir the psychedelic
experience. Everyone can try: Facebook's Second American Revolution). Even lying about
what Tom meant by separation of church-and state. Let's not be negligent: their recent
proclamations on the immoral/unnatural/abnormal homos rendered from top of Mt. Supreme.
The 20% who identify themselves as libs have the power for since the '60s, they have
controlled the TV, movie and record industries, as well as, most major newspapers and
magazine. And, of course, public elementary/high schools and colleges.
Libs favor all kinds of family units except the traditional one. Making divorce acceptable
and single parenthood beginning in the '60s, there greatest crime has been to children! The
notion that women on welfare should keep their children and receive Aid to Dependent
Children. Dooming most of them to a life a failure and misery. Study after study has shown
that a child is best off in a mom-dad household functional followed by mom-dad
dysfunctional followed by single parent functional followed by single parent dysfunctional
(studies which follow children to adolescence and young adulthood to determine percentage
which drop out of school, take up drugs, divorce, unable to hold a job, do time behind bars,
etc.; studies strongly imply mom-mom and dad-dad households wouldn't be in child's best
interest).
Let's get down to business...We think that most Americans know when a bill should be a
Constitutional Amendment. It doesn't mean spending and tax bills. It doesn't mean all BIG
bills. It does mean social or domestic legislation which will profoundly alter the very nature
of American society.
Perhaps, the House Speaker, the House Majority and Minority Leaders, as well as, the
Senate Majority and Minority Leaders can each choose two individuals - a member and a
non-member of Congress - to serve on a Special Constitutional Committee to decide when a
bill or a Supreme Court decision rises to the level of a Constitutional Amendment. The House
Majority and Minority Leaders would each choose a constitutional lawyer; if one
chooses a lib, the other would choose a constructionalist. to serve as chairmen. Fair and
Balanced. If they judge a bill to meet the criteria of an amendment, it would require
approval of over two-thirds of both houses and then be sent to the states where 38 states
must grant approval. A tie vote by the committee would mean that it is a bill. We don't
want to many CAs. State legislators can convene for two weeks every year or two to
consider CAs. If none, they can conduct regular state business. CAs come with a time limit
of one or more years to render a decision.
You might ask, "What about emergency legislation such as BO.'s bailouts of auto,
housing, banking industries? (We opposed: we don't subscribe to the concept of too BIG
to fail. BO's solutions were socialist and he unconstitutionally played a bankruptcy
judge regarding auto). If approved by congress would it be too much to ask states to
go into emergency session. Perhaps, it doesn't rise to the level of a CA as it wasn't
concerned with social policy where most CAs should be. We're debating with
each other! It wouldn't preclude members of Congress from proposing CAs in the
traditional manner without the involvement of the Special Constitutional Amendment
Committee (should they be limited to considering social legislation or social and
domestic?).
What is clear is that the Founding Fathers wanted state involvement when it came
to changing the Constitution and making radical alterations to American society. You
might argue that CAs are only for altering Constitution not altering society. We contend
that it should be for both.
Why? Amendment 10 in the Bill of Rights: Any power or responsibility not given
directly to fed gov by the Constitution shall be considered a state or a people power. Yet,
over the past 100 years or so fed gov has created new powers and responsibilities for
itself and has usurped state rights via a distorted interpretation of the Commerce Clause
or through legislation such as LBJ's Great Society Programs. Most new laws and
regs take power and responsibility away from citizens and businesses. All of which we
deem unconstitutional.
Will there ever be a Special Constitutional Committee? Not likely because of
Amendment 17. A SCC would probably require a Constitutional Amendment. There
is the other method - tried trice unsuccessfully - wherein two-thirds of states call for a
Constitutional Convention to pass amendments which then must be approved by 38
states. we should contact our state legislators by visit or email or phone and demand a
Constitutional Convention. Waste of time? No; politicians pay attention to those who
contact them or members of their staffs for they know that those who take the time
to contact are likely voters and may even have influence in their communities. We
should contact our members of congress as well for the other method. Moderate
and Conservatives should be talking BIG-time about U.S. Constitution, state rights
and citizen's rights. It should be the Republican Party's Number One Issue. Perhaps,
with the internet, someday, citizens can vote on CAs - participatory democracy rather
than representative democracy. And, Amendment 17 should be repealed!!!
Mary Jane...After decades and hundreds of billions of dollars, the War
on Drugs has been lost. It's been estimated that 75% of border violence would
disappear if Mary Jane were legal. Is it a gateway drug? Evidence isn't conclusive. We
have always staunchly opposed to its legalization. We worry that if it is legalized that
over time it will lead to the legalization of other drugs. In the self-same fashion that
legalizing same-sex marriage could lead to polygamy (those that want this perverted
lifestyle legal are examining the recent Supreme Court decision (what gives them
the right to legislate and alter society!?!); triads; three or more men or women;
bestial; man with of age daughter; women with pet rock. Libs have been degrading the
sanctity of marriage since the '60s. Bill Buckley, the Founder of Modern Conservatism,
came to support Mary Jane. We'd prefer a Constitutional Amendment, as opposed to.
a fed law enabling states to have their say (Remember: Our proposal for A Special
Constitutions Committee would have to have its parameters defined). MJ should only be
sold by doctors and pharmacists as part of their practices or they can open up facilities
just for its sale. They would note customer's age, state of health and whether purchase is
for recreational or so-called health purposes. He or she would determine dosage and
frequency of refills for each individual consumer. No new regs. Nearly every time a
new law is passed or reg instituted is, we lose more of our liberty (See: "Upside Down
Article." here and "Facing Demise/Reg Laws Unconstitutional" at groups.google.com/
group/newfederalism go together with this article like love and marriage/soup and
sandwich). We are confident that 99% of docs and pharmacists will act responsibility.
As a deterrent: If person commits a crime and being under the influence is a factor, doc
or pharmacist can be charged with negligence. They would have to prove that they had an
appropriate regime for the accused and convince authorities. A second amendment
might be necessary to permanently forbid the legalization of the other drugs. It would
be a source of tax revenue in this time of national and state debts.
Getting Back to Our Roots...A dream Constitutional Amendment that will limit fed
gov to those areas granted to it the Constitution. It might be chaotic to make it
retro-active but future would suffice. Everyone would dance naked in the streets having
rediscovered their long lost freedoms. It will never happen.
None of these things will come to pass. To say that we live in a free country is
laughable. To say that we have a capitalistic system is laughable. To say that we live in
a moral society is laughable. There is the Rule of Nine, Congress constantly passing laws
and the Exec Branch new regs and the power of the 20% who identify themselves as libs.
The rights of Citizens, businesses, state and localities, the way our Founding Fathers
wanted it is ancient history. When BO assumed officer fed gov controlled 18% of the
economy and when he departs it shall be 35%. We all know how much better gov is at
running things than citizens and businesses! Most Americans have forgotten about the
'most transparent' president's 44 secret czars. Who know what they do as the good people
are in the arms of Morpheus. We didn't just loose the social war but the war to retain our
liberties. There will never be a Second American Revolution. The FFs wanted a fed gov
off to the side not in our face. Libs win.
The Rise and Fall of Western Civilization, including, American Branch. Western
Europe and, importantly, the U.K. have fallen more rapidly than USA. Its genesis was in the
'60d when libs began knocking the greatest culture (bar none; no brag, just fact) in schools
and elsewhere and with the passage of the Immigration Act of '65. The consequences being
multi-culturalism - which divides and doesn't unite. There is so much WC to cover that it and
only it should be taught in public and private elementary and high schools. Embraced by all.
Leave you non-WC culture to the home or annual parades and college electives. One/United
nation. Within a hundred years, the majority of Americans will be Latino or Hispanic (whatever,
they prefer to be called). USA will be a Latin American nation. Can anyone named a
successful Latin American Country? Can anyone name a Latin American that is in the top ten in
anything? We are Number One in Military Power (although, BO props up Russia). We have the
World's Biggest Economy (which BO will destroy with debt). We are Number One in
Technology, including, space and medicine (not much longer due to BO policies). We are still
Number One in the Production and Distribution World-wide of Entertainment (although, the
quality of that entertainment has declined since the '80s). Surprisingly, you would think
otherwise, we are Number Two or Three in manufacturing while we continue to slip due to
BO's unions.
The media along with public schools and colleges continues its efforts to create not reflect
society. Recently, the ABC Family cable network aired a TV movie entitled, "Burlesque."
Synopsis: "..with the help from a savvy stage manager and a gender-bender host, a
cocktail waitress with a stunning voice becomes a performer in a club's musical revue."
This constitutes family entertainment to lib ABC. The whole family should pop popcorn and
watch together - parents to wee ones!!! Remember what Zeus did last time humans
fell.
Zeus: "I might do another Great Flood and once again allow my brother, Poseidon, to
save a man and a women on an ark to later repopulate humanity."
No comments:
Post a Comment