Saturday, April 17, 2010

"COSMIC TRINITY" JOURNEY

Owner's Note: An editor's note would be in bad form and the height of conceit
for the advertisement was written by the editor.

http://memphis.craigslist.org/crs/1696842765.html

---
This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.

Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Fwd: Regular E-mail: Can He Do It?





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Apr 2, 2010 10:28 pm
Subject: Regular E-mail: Can He Do It?

THE CROWD IS HOLDING IT'S BREATH. He's taking a few practice shots. He feels loose. He's getting
into position. Wait! He took a step backward. He's attempting to regain his nerve. He waves to the crowd.
He's back in position. Here it comes...My house was built circa 1940. For years, I tried to find out what was here
prior to that. Last year, I called the Brooklyn Historical Society. I was told that they don't do research for
individuals. I'm not above exploited my disability. Cut to the chase...Bay Ridge Nursery and Greenhouse;
before approx. 1930 - likely woods. Oh no! He slipping. The crowd is shouting: "Get a grip. You can do it."
,,,Washington had a list of 110 rules regarding etiquette, manners and courtesies he tried to follow. Now Miss
Manners and the University of Virginia are creating a new list based on his list. It is sure is need today!
And teenage girls on the Internet - don't they have any respect for themselves. Years ago, I carried a cane
I rarely used it: sometimes you feel like a nut and sometimes you don't; Peter Paul's has nuts and Monds
don't. Sometimes,  you feel like a cripple and sometimes, you don't) and I would give up my seat to a women.
People looked shocked and stared. I don't mind attention. And, besides, I was just being a gentleman like I
was raised to be. Manners are disappearing just like morality! Strike out, Rick.

Fwd: MY ITALIAN ANCESTORS





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 28, 2010 7:23 pm
Subject: MY ITALIAN ANCESTORS

Editors Note: By new
citizen journalist Alexa (DePersio) Higginson. You guessed it: She's my pretty and
intelligent and talented 9-year old niece. Announcement: She and my other niece Katie
Higginson (age 13) are now Rickcosmos-Eclectic Websites: Youth Contributing Writers. Leave a nice comment or send it to her uncle (rrdd3939@aol.com).

                                                                            My Italian Ancestors

America! Land of the free, home of the brave! More opportunities, better jobs for more money, more rights ......those are the hopes and dreams that brought people here from all over the world! Amongst them was my family on my mom's (dads side)...the DePersio's!
The red white and blue country is the freedom country -  that is why my great, great grandparents came to America. This is what I was told to be their story. Their names were John Anthony Di Persia & Marie Josephine Di Persia. John Anthony came over under his name in Italian which is Giovanni Antonio Di Persia. They were the first family members to come to America. They came from Naples, Italy.
As many people did and still do,  they came for better jobs, freedom and a better way of life for themselves & their families.
They arrived in the very late 1800's. They traveled here by boat. I was told the boats name was called"The Iniziativa". Inziativa means enterprise in Italian. The boat came into Ellis Island. Ellis Island is in New York Bay. It is the former immigration station in the United States, where over 12 million immigrants passed through.
My great, great Grandparents traveled together. I think they dressed quite different from today's styles. The woman usually wore long dresses and hats with a lot of flowers. Men wore black top hats, suits and ties.
Later when my great, great grandparents had children & they went to school the last name was changed from Di Persia to DePersio, making the I an E and taking the space away before the P.The school felt it was more American that way.
This is the story of my ancestors on my Italian side. I am really glad they came to America for a better life. If it weren't for them making this journey, I may not have had all the wonderful opportunities and bnefits of this great country.

Fwd: ADDed Article 3, Version 2 or Article 8, Version 4 continued







-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 8:39 pm
Subject: Fwd: ADDed Article 3, Version 2 or Article 8, Version 4 continued

        Subtitle: We Don't Shy Away from Controversy Here, We Wallow in it!

                                          by Richard DePersio 

       Take it off...Take it all off...Take off that uniform - preferably on a stage! Fact:
In the early 1980s very few women could pass the mental and physical tests to get
into police academy and few of the few who did couldn't successfully graduate from it.
Result: One by one cities lowered their entrance and graduation standards. Cities
claimed that the old tests were outmoded. Everyone knew the dirty little secret that you weren't suppose to talk about but this guy did. He was never P.C. They lowered it
because of pressure from liberals in general and feminists in particular. This writer isn't
being sexist. He's talking public security here.The police shouldn't be the place for liberal social experimentation! Of course, a women - a real women - shouldn't want to war such a uniform. But this is a free country and she has every right to do so even if it means lying to herself. Pride: Take any type of civil service exam and get 10 points added to your exam score if you have a vagina or dark scin.No wonder people complain about the incompetence of most government workers. How can they be proud of themselves? How can you know which women and minorities deserve the job that they have because they really passed and didn't have to resort - lower themselves - by invoking affirmative action. And then there are the affirmative action scholarships
given to women and minorities to go to college, in spite of the fact, that they barely
passed high school! Set-asides are affirmative action contracts that federal, state
and local government give to female- or minority-owned companies even though they
didn't give the lowest bid. They are eligible for 8 out of every 10 contracts if they give
the lowest bid but only they can receive 2 out of every 10 which cost the taxpayers
more money.
      Let's get back to plaid uniforms...uniforms...that's for an entirely different type
of website...uniforms are the most serious. President Nixon established the
all-volunteer military in 1974 by 1980 only about 5% of the military had breasts.
Why? They rarely compete with, train with and rarely are graded with men - true to
this day. Obviously, that didn't represent sufficient affirmative action - more was needed. They still had to do the same things that men did in basic training (army and air force) and boot camp (navy and marines; which is slightly tougher) but the passing grade was lowered. Today, women who comprise a whopping 15% of the military - should we lower passing to "f' for female - serve proudly in their uniforms! Confirmed for this writer by two off-duty and out-of-uniform soldiers. (Nothing homo implied; homo is immoral according to Bible and abnormal and unnatural according to evolution).
      Even though, they are endangering lives! A retired police office once told this
guy that he didn't have a problem with women in uniform (have you seen the website?!)
but didn't want one as a partner.The police shouldn't be the place for liberal social
experimentation! He explained that a partner is  suppose to protect his partner but
shouldn't have to spend an inordinate amount of time doing so. Men by nature and
on a subconscious-level are compelled to protect women and he didn't want to
spend an inordinate amount of time doing so. Further he explained, the bad guys would be inclined to shoot more bullets in the direction of the male cop.(Subconscious at work).
       By law, women cannot serve in a combat zone. Now-a-days, they can serve in
semi-combat zones. Patrolling an area where there may be snipers in order to finish
securing the area after the battle - harsh fighting - is over. They have served in support
since 1974 and occasionally certain support soldiers have to be briefly in a combat zone. Our motto is fair and balanced. However, if they ever released the figures on
male vs. female casualties (killed or wounded), we'll wager that, in spite of the fact,
that they can't be assigned to combat duty but semi-combat and support that their
are a disproportionate number of female casualties - more the 15%.
       Fire departments having been fighting fires and fighting to keep their standards
high since the early '80s not to keep women and minorities out but in the name of
public safety. In 2000 and even more so last year, they lost the fight. They were
compelled to lower entrance and graduation requirements for fire academy and redesign tests in such a way that more women had minorities could pass. Last year,  the 'new and improved' requirements and tests imposed. Low and behold, only men passed and 9 of them white! Liberals cried foul and felt the men shouldn't be allowed to became firemen (sometimes this writer is old-fashioned) - did you ever hear of something so ridiculous. Fortunately, the case went to a constructionalist judge who found the case silly and absurd. It went to the appeals court which upheld the lower court decision - one appeals court judge ruled in the negative and is the newest member of the U.S. Supreme Court!
       Did you ever wonder why there are so many overweight and illiterate cops -
lower standards for one group and other groups may take advantage of it. Did you
ever observe roadside workers where the women watch while the men unload the
heavy equipment.
       Liberal social experimentation vs. public safety, domestic security and national
security. It has nothing to with discrimination and everything to do with high standards
to protect Americans. Laugh: equal-pay-for-equal-work! Someone once said: "you can have an all-male army and be successful but not an all-female or all-gay one and protect Americans!
       There is only one solution: requirements and tests: hip-hop and cosmetics!

       They were known as progressives from 1870 and liberals since 1950. A liberal
prior to 1850 was like a libertarian or conservative today. Example: Our Founding
Father's (Framers for the 'elite' P.C. crowd) instituted classical market liberalism
- later know as capitalism. During the 1980s, Reagan and conservatives turned
liberalism into a dirty word (rightfully, so) and ever since then more and more liberals
have embraced the term progress ism again. Two of their heroes (or one hero and
one heroine for the non-P.C. amongst us); Wilson and Sanger (Your Secretary of
State Hillary (we're good friends) reminded us of how wonderful they think that they
were). Wilson was a progressive Democrat who did marvelous things like segregate
blacks from whites in the military (and you thought that it happened after Reconstruction), institute the progressive income tax (there had only been a 1%
tax on the 1% wealthiest income tax during the Civil War to help pay for it), initiate
the useless League of Nations (which Americans refused to join; what an embarrassment for little Wilson) the forerunner of the useless U.N., got us into WW1
and incarcerated some of his opponents in spite of free search! Sanger, author of
"Breeding the Thoroughbred," is another great one: she started Planned Parenthood
and supported eugenics, including, the sterilization of blacks, the mentally and
physically impaired, favored allowing judges to use it as part of a sentence and
aborting babies right after birth if deemed 'defective'!

         During Obama's Inaugural Address, He stated: "We are a nation of believers and
non-believers." I was alone. I hollowed: "Oh, no." I knew what it meant: liberals
felt ready to replace the real Constitution with the progressive 'living' socialist con-
stitution! It would take weeks, if not, months for some moderate and conservative
so-called experts to realize it. This reporter, at the time, suggested that there was a remote possibility that we would become a communist nation. Only recently, and we believe for the first rime, Beck suggested it on his T.V. show (this is small potatoes. last year, we scooped him twice big-time!). Recently, O'reilly indicated that he suspected that their were problems with Fannie and Freddie in 2007; 2006 for this letter-puncher. Not long ago, Hannity stated: "Didn't our enemies say that the would get us from within?" We pointed out in our communist article that Krushev (is that how you spell Ruskie's name; he died persona non grata in his own country - are we being ADDed?!) stated that "America would be destroyed from within." We thought about those that surrounded Obama before and since becoming President - we saw red! Small wins.Petty? A few notches above. We need another big one!

           NASA warmest January (average temperature since official since official records have been kept!

           China implied that it wouldn't do anything regarding U.S. Bonds within next
five years. Experts: Because, it might hurt them. This Expert: various weapons have
been sold to Taiwan by U.S. some of which China objects. Delivery is due soon. Let's see if sale's manifests changes.To the best of our knowledge that's constitutes a BOLD and FRESH prediction. Last year, China prevented Australia from making certain economic moves to reduce it's inflation because China thought that it might - just, might - have ramifications for it's economy. Australia like the U.S. is owned by China!






Fwd: ADDed Article 3 Version 2 or Article 8 Version 4







-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 24, 2010 9:21 pm
Subject: ADDed Article 3 Version 2 or Article 8 Version 4

                       by Mr. ADD Himself: RIchard DePersio

Editors Note: Rickcosmos (multiple personalities too?) was diagnosed by Doc L. as
having ADD after Doc. L. had known RC for three years (Rick hadn't had a medical doctor for over  fifteen years - podiatrists until 1995 who did more for his neuromuscular conditions then neurologists and orthopedists - prior to becoming Doctor L.'s patient in 2005). Rick suspected that he was unorthodox at 20 upon conducting introspection
regarding child- and teen-hood and merrily excepted what came nature and not by design.Two years ago, Doc. L. K. recommended that Rich read: "Driven to Distraction" by Edward Hallowell after thoroughly explaining condition to him. RD was on cloud 9!
While everyone had ADD to a modest extent, you can't claim to be a member of the club unless you have it to a moderate to large degree from childhood or adolescence.
In spite of his inability to ambulate, he did a cartwheel upon realizing that he had regular plus three other forms! It's great to be different!!! Recently, Doc K. recommended: "Why is it Always About You?-The Seven Deadly Sins of Narcissism" - somehow he doesn't think that he'll enjoy this book so much. Then again, you never know!

      February is one of the most important months of the year as three great men
were born in that month: George, Abe and (as O'reilly would say) this humble reporter.
Beginning at around 1910 at a modest scale by progressives and continuing with
their descendants the liberals in the 1950s and accelerating for the past 20 or so
years, there as been an effort to knock the Founding Father's down a few pegs in
an effort to replace their Federalist/Constructionalist Constitution with the so-called
progressive 'living' constitution. It's being done in most public schools, as well as, the
media. Let's look at a couple of examples: !) Jefferson fathered a baby with a black
slave in 1996 (no - that's not when he did the fathering - - although, many public
school students might think so if this writer doesn't point it out for their knowledge
of American history is parochial and revised by liberal history textbook writers; it
was the year the story broke - give or take a year - - having problems with recent
American history, are we? - and the media covered for for way more then 2 days which
meant that it had legs. A couple of years later, it was discovered that in all likely hood
it was his nephew - most of the media didn't cover it or glossed over it. 2) Was
George a Christian (this scribe can call him George because he and America's
four other greatest presidents - Tom, Jim, Abe and Ron - often drop by for good conversation and ale when their in the neighborhood). Liberals having been claiming
and teaching that 10% of the Founding Fathers were Christians, 40% deists (which
is a philosophy excepting God and heaven while rejecting miracles and prophesies
and isn't practiced for it isn't a religion) and 50 per cent atheists and agnostics. Other
public schools ignore religion in history altogether, in spite of the fact, it played
a major role - our children are being indoctrinated and in some cases and there are
big gaping holes in their education in other cases. As Friday would say: "Just the facts, ma'am - 90% were Christians (although, they didn't all subscribe to a particular religious denomination and some weren't regular church-goers), 7% were deists and 3 per cent atheists or agnostics.. The nation as a whole was 99% Christian and today
75 to 80% identified themselves as such and we have Judeo-Christian and capitalistic
based "Declaration of Independence," "Constitution, including, Bill of Rights" and 
laws predicated on common law and Christian theology. We are without question a
Christian nation. According to Dr. Peter Lillaback, author of: Sacred Fire," according
to his grandchildren, he often wrote sermons which he read to his wife Martha,
occasionally attended services and had many Christians friends. And, further,
Dr. Lillaback states that they would make for fine sermons today.
     Are you reading the words of a biased Christian. This writer stopped being a
Catholic at age 20, was an atheist from 20 to 30 and a agnostic and pantheist from 30 to ? What about now? As Number 2 would say: "That would be telling." Will reveal soonest. Interesting this writer supports the "Alliance Defense Fund" which fights
to protect the civil rights of Christians against the "American Civil Liberties Union"
which don't think Christians have them.

       According to Paul Gigot of the Wall Street Journal, the filibuster was rarely
used before 1900 and has been used progressively more and more since then.
In 1994, the filibuster couldn't be used for budgetary bills but would be unconstitutional not to be able to use it for other bills. The writer asks: why was it all of a sudden constitutional not to apply it to budgetary bills? Don't major constitutional changes - like major healthcare reform - - no constitutional authority for federal involvement in healthcare - - - require Constitutional Conventions? Dems in Congress say: Don't
bother me. Ask a constitutional expert. I make laws - constitution gives me that right.
Ask constitutional professor.


        According to Charles K. of Fox News: The U.S. Intelligence Estimate of 2007
claiming Iran had stopped developing bomb probably prevented Bush from making
surgical strikes on their nuclear and missile facilities. This writer feels report might
have been political. Long-time government bureaucrats sometimes undermine presidents. These are at the lower and some middle management level and staff
members (all civil servants) who have worked in Washington for many years. New
presidents can't replace all members of executive branch. Yes- White House Senior
Staff and their members for example, Chief-of -Staff and his subordinates, National
Security Advisor and his senior staff and some middle. Cabinet Secretaries and their
upper managers and staffs and some middle managers and their staffs.

                                     TO BE CONTINUED









Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. =

Fwd: New and Improved (so says Topper): An ADDed Article







-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com

Sent: Mon, Feb 1, 2010 9:42 pm
Subject: New and Improved (so says Topper): An ADDed Article

Editor's Note: This article is being expanded via the addition of an editor's note a brought back by
popular demand (someone liked it!).
Three years ago, my doctor told me to purchase "Driven to Distraction" by Edward Hallowell, M.D.
My doctor saw notes including my corrections of the author (my primary physician (my only physician for the past five years  - I hadn't been seen by a doctor in over ten years prior to encountering this doctor who was willing to make house calls because I'm Rick -  had just diagnosed my ADD), he thought
it strange the I would correct a doctor/author. I don't get it. It had to do with the doctor of oddities (I didn't say 'freaks' I'm learning to be PC; I got a D-plus on last test) and looney tunes (a.k.a. psychiatrists) placing emphasis on genetic on behavior which is a view to which I don't subscribe. It was so proud to discover that I had regular ADD plus three special forms.I was on cloud nine - the less like common people the better.
Now, my sawbones (usually used to refer to surgeons...I'm correcting myself...do what you were doing
before I was driven to distraction...I'm back) has recommended "Why is it Always About You" by
Susan Chotchkiss (I'm nearly certain that I spelled it correctly - I know the first thing that I would say
to her if I met here - we ADDers often speak without thinking).
Is my  doctor trying to tell me something!?
I'm watching "Attack of the Show" (no one can guess my age; demographics for show: 18 to 35 -
advertisers love our group) and Kevin is interviewing Steven Seagal and he said: "It seems like supper heroes and action stars of today don't look like real men."I don't think that we have many man actors since circa 1980. The seventies were borderline.We had our man actors from about 1930 to 1970 - voice, dress, attitude, gate, facial expressions, etc.










-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Dec 26, 2009 6:11 pm
Subject: Your Gift: An ADDed Article

                                                  by Richard DePersio
                               groups.google.com/groups/rickcosmos-eclectic
                                         (all websites listed at group site)

Fact: Recently, 66% of Americans celebrated Christmas as a religious holy day and a secular holiday or just as a religious holy day; 33% celebrated it as a secular holiday; 1% don't celebrate it or don't know where they were and what they were doing on that day. Season's Greetings, Happy Holidays, Winter Solstice nonsense. It is a legal, national holiday celebrating the birth of a great philosopher or the Son of God. And, if you don't like it (by the way, this writer is no longer a Christian; praise Jesus) have the name of the holiday changed! It's P.C. to dump on Christians but you have to be P.C.-sensitive and have a multi-cultural nonsense attitude when it comes to the handful of non-Christians (Jews, Muslims), who in reality except for a couple of chestnuts aren't offended - it's a myth generated by liberal-atheists and liberal-Christians and liberal-non-Christians (about 20% of the population is liberal) that 99% of them are offended by Christmas and the religious and non-religious things associated with it - a lie that they perpetrate about Jews(absolutely!) and Muslims(?) (Logic: Veterans parading is associated with Veteran's Day, turkey with Thanksgiving, fireworks shows with Independence Day, Dick Clark's Ball with the New Year).
Fact: 70% of the well-known and the semi-well-known Founding Fathers were Christians (the
fast majority of whom practiced a particular Christian denomination; 25% were deists (which is
a philosophy not a religion in which believe in God and heaven are derived from reason, Jesus
was a great philosopher and many of our Fathers quoted from the Bible in political speeches and during political debates. but don't except miracles and prophecies as fact but moral stories and in some cases fabricated; 5% were atheists, agnostics, pantheists (they believe that the whole universe plus the laws of the universe such as gravity that make it operate is God), Jews, etc.
Fact: The general population at it's founding was 99% Christian; 1/2% Jewish; 1/2% other and they created a nation predicated on Judeo-Christian principles.
Fact: Today, 77% identify themselves as  Christian; 4% Jewish; 3% Muslim; 1% Hindu and Buddhist; 15% subscribe to the following philosophies: atheist and agnostic 12% and deist, pantheist, etc. 3%.
 
When Rudy (I choose not to attempt to spell his last name) was Mayor of New York City, he
substantially increased police presence in black neighborhoods. In the U.S., 16% of the
population is black (13% African-American). Crime is those neighborhoods substantially
dropped. Blacks are responsible for over 50% of the major crimes: murders, rapes, assaults
and armed robberies. What makes it even more embarrassing for black people is the fact
that a majority of it is black on black crime. When Bloomberg (I can spell it because I checked
how it is spelled on T.V.; you do know that the Mayor owns or is the chief stockholder
in the Bloomberge cable T.V. network?) became mayor, he was forced by black leaders like
the Rev. Farrakan, the Rev. Jackson, the Rev. Sharpton (I'm a bigot if I misspelled any
of their names!) and liberal white politicians to do away with the Rudy increase. He compromised and cut it in half and crime went up but not to pre-Rudy levels. Why? The'leaders' hollowed racism and racial profiling!What did the fast majority of the people living in those communities feel: they were in favor of it and wanted police presence to rise even more. Black leaders and liberal white politicians and judges are out of touch with real black people and notice that most of them don't
live in these neighborhoods!
Elinor Tatum, publisher of the black New York City newspaper: "The Amsterdam News,"
explains that black newspapers try to talk for the black community and their reporters live among them! She states, "Still others talk for us but they're anointed not elected." This writer believes
that she is speaking of the famous Reverends - we forgot the Rev. 'Wrong' - and other
black leaders and liberal white politicians of their ilk because she takes the position
that "...there are the talking heads" and that "the real leaders are the local church pastor
the grandmother who lives on the corner, the school principal."                                             (She appeared on CUNY T.V.'s African-American Legends. Are you shocked that this composer of words (a moderate-conservative - some, say, conservative with a pinch a libertarianism - would
watch such a show! Or, might watch Chris Mathers or Larry King or CNN. There is a
difference between educated and indoctrinated. Indoctrination is what our kids and
grand kids - I don't have a kid, I have two niece kids and a sponsored kid - - - only
liberals have compassion - their bleeding hearts. This guy rarely talks about what a
great uncle he is and about his little girl in Honduras. unlike liberals, we rarely go
around like liberal celebrities, politicians and professors and talk about what goody two
shoes we are. We don't do it for a pat on the back or in an effort to try to distract from all
the bad that we do! Conservatives aren't phonies like liberals. We're depicted as cold and callous
because we oppose failed liberal social programs and want to try new approaches to
helping the needy like school vouchers and faith-based programs instead of throwing
good money after bad. Workfare was restoring pride to the poor - Republicans forced
Clinton to sign it and Bush expanded it - millions were going off of it. One of the
first things that Obama did as president was sign an executive order restoring welfare.
Liberal don't rarely care about the needy - they want to keep the poor poor for they
vote democrat and now they're in the process with healthcare and energy reform, new
regulations, new cooperate take-overs, tax hikes and new government give-away's of making
all of us dependent on Nanny Obama from cradle to grave!).

The universe is 13.7 billion years old. You've heard of the Big Bang? Actually, it wasn't big
and it wasn't loud! A light year is the distance that a ray of light covers in one year which
is 6 trillion miles - now that's fast! (Or, a 186,000 per second!). One light year equals 6 trillion miles. Our present  telescopes on earth and, especially, in space can 'see' 13.4 billion light years back in the microwave part of the spectrum. Space is a time machine. The further into space that you look the further back in time that you see. The sun is a star and it takes light  8  minutes to reach us traveling at 186,000 miles per second from a distance of 93 millions
miles. The famous Andromeda Galaxy is 2.5 million light years away and, there, for we
see it the way it looked 2.5 million years ago. (By the way, it is going to collide with our
Galaxy in 3 billion years).Originally, the universe was smaller then  an atom or it was a point (the
opposite of big) and expanded rapidly and there was no air to carry sound (result: no
bang) and a fraction of a second later it inflated - it expanded again - this time faster then
light ( but Einstein stated that particles with mass( like protons, neutrons and electrons can't travel at the speed of light and mass less particles - light and invisible light - can travel
at the speed of light - but nothing can travel faster then light - - - he didn't tell us that space
couldn't travel faster then light!).You are thinking of empty space - a vacuum - but there is
no such thing. This area of space less then the size of an atom contained 10 dimensions
of space (you're familiar with three: length , width and depth), dark energy, dark matter,
potential energy and matter (the type which we are familiar). During the first 'bang' exotic
particles formed from potential matter and then space expanded faster then light carrying
the particles along for the ride. Picture yourself on a conveyer belt at the airport. As far as
your concerned your standing still reading your newspaper or today more likely talking on
your cell phone or texting. Picture yourself as the exotic particle and the belt as space. To
be more accurate the space belt section behind you is traveling faster then then it is in front
of you. It also means that our universe of regular matter and energy only occupies a small fraction
of the space generated from the second 'bang' - it continued to expand without normal mass
and energy within in it in which another 'big bang' can take place in 'our' universe but we can't
see it because light from it - traveling at the speed of light - visible, radio, x-ray - hasn't
had time to reach us. Where did the BIG BANG take place? In the center of the area 300,000
years after the big bang that we  can 'see' as 3 degree Kelvin radiation in the microwave. That
was when the universe lit up and became visible but since then it has lost energy and cooled
off and is 'visible' in the microwave. Wrong! The BIG BANG didn't take place there. It took
place no where or everywhere. Yo can say that it took place in the center of your body or
in the center of our Galaxy or in the center of the area 300,000 years after the BIG BANG -
but so could a living being in another Galaxy claim the the BIG BANG took place in
the center of himself or the center of his galaxy which is further in or further out then our
galaxy which would place the center of the 3 degree Kelvin radiation at a point displaced
from our central point for the 3 degree Kelvin radiation. Do you want to become further 
discombobulated. The radius of our universe is 13.7 billion light years and the diameter is
twice that amount but for a galaxy a billion miles out the edge of the universe 13.7 and the
opposite edge is 13.7 billion miles out. He is detecting that 3 degree Kelvin radiation 1.3 billion
years after us - no! As far as he's concerned it is 300.000 years after the Big Bang. But
this scribe stated that because of the second Big Bang - there is empty (which really
isn't empty with dimensions and dark matter and potential regular matter, etc. But the
guy in the galaxy further out will see 3 degree Kelvin radiation and closer in the first galaxies
that formed but we see nothing. And, let's go crazy - the 3 degree Kelvin radiation is all around
us at a distance of 13.4 billion light years shouldn't it be within in  emanating from and
area 600,000 light years in diameter and not 27.4 billion miles in diameter. Solution?: Remember
what Albert taught us: everything is relative!!!

Wordsworth: "Are those by distance made more sweet."

Saint Nicholas (aka Santa Claus) A pimp or whatever, they had been called around 350 A.D.
( We no P.C. here: C.E. is anti-Christian and this is a Christian nation in spite of me) purchased
three girls to become part of his herd.Then-Bishop Nicholas bought them from the pimp so they wouldn't have to demean themselves as hookers ( or whatever, the trash were called in those days) and could service him! (I made up the part after the word 'and').

Shakespeare: "An admirable musician. O, she will sing the savageness out of a bear!"

For it is each a part of that which we call human nature. Order from disorder (anti-entropy); 
coalesces to create the whole and to make sense. It comes together to create a point (a black
hole by one definition...OR...
Robert Herrick: "A sweet disorder in the dress
                        Kindles in clothes a wantonness:
                        A lawn about the shoulders thrown
                        Into a fine distraction...
                        A careless shoe-string, in whose tie
                        I see a wild civility:
                        Do more bewitch me, than when Art
                        Is too precise in every part."




Fwd: "THERE'S AN OLD ARMY SAYING..." VERSION 3 UPDATED SUPPLEMENT





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: 
Sent: Sat, Feb 6, 2010 10:19 pm
Subject: "THERE'S AN OLD ARMY SAYING..." VERSION 3 UPDATED SUPPLEMENT



.


                                                          PREFACE:
EDITOR'S NOTE: rickcosmos' (Richard DePersio) high school teachers and college professors
would have a field day with article and supplement and utterly relish giving him a BIG FAT 'D' and
he would enjoy it immensely!! He wrote articles back then and not book reports and term
papers to their dismay and frustration. They would turn the BIG FAT 'D' into a BIG FAT 'F' because
of the supplement with a preface and a game. Let the ADD good times roll. He hated school and
driving teachers up the proverbial wall but took great proud in his self-education.
       Let the games begin...There was a New Year's contest at group site: groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic The three questions were: 1) Who was the Patron Saint of hookers; 2) Who remembers Topper and Harvey; 3) What odd couple is alleged to be members of the "Illuminati" (Saw movie "Angels and Demons" but that won't help you with question)?
      The prizes: a BIG WET KISS for one correct answer, two BIG WET KISSES for two correct
answers and five BIG WET KISSES for three correct answers (by reservation only). Everyone is
eligible except homos and you must be a female between the ages of 18 and 70. (Answers at
end of supplement; don't peek; honors system: you can only collect your prize if you can refrain 
from peeking - which is hard for girls to do!). (The end of preface shouldn't be red' Just realized it
and too lazy to rectify it (memories of school days!).

"Journey from the Earth to the Moon" Western Europeans, especially, the smelly French have
 always looked down at us (The British are true friends). Yet, Jules Verne, Frenchman, was a
visionary and science prophet (he and the Englishman, H.G. Wells, are called the "Fathers
of science fiction; although, there are those who only recognize one - it has been a raging debate for decades. Wells was a science teacher and Verne was self-educated in science and had
many friends who were scientists. They were science science-fiction writers. Is your ADDed
reporter going off on a tangent!) who chose a site in Florida not far from today's space center. Why would he think that the first flight to the moon would take place from the U.S. and
not his beloved France. How unlike a Frenchman not to be a snob!. He believed that the U.S. had great potential and would soon be number one in science, technology and economics. He
penned his book in the 1860's. It was around 1920 that we began our move to number one and 1946 when we achieved  the trophy! Verne was indeed a science prophet! In
a fit of madness they gave us the Statue of Liberty circa 1880 for our growth as a nation, 
in the hope that we would remain true to our ideals and that France would move in the direction that we had chosen. So un-Frenchy! Our growth  in the '40's - atomic age, the '50's - the television age and the '60's - the space age. Problems began in the '70's when we reduced spending on the space agency - a unique federal program which benefited so many of the sciences and was at the cutting edge of developments in electronics, computer technology, micro miniaturization, engineering (other government programs are limited to just one thing) which enabled our enemies in World War 2 - Germany and Japan - which we rebuilt after the war and set them on the right path in science and technology to began breathing down our necks in a close second. Germany fell after it reunited in 1990 and was replaced by China in 1990s. Today, we still have the world's richest and biggest economy but it is shrinking .Japan is number 2. It is expected to be replaced by China by 2012. China was expected to replace us in 2025 - now, courtesy of Obama could occur in 2015. Science and technology
have been the engines of the economy since the Industrial Revolution and now we are number
one in very few areas - one of which is improving existing and creating new medications.
Japan is number one in the most important area: computer/robotic technology. China was a
third-world nation until 1990 when they became a developing nation. They are now an industrialized
nation. They will be a post-industrialized nation (or service economy) within 5 years. It makes you dizzy. They moved through the phases even more rapidly then us! 
       It is broke but can be fixed. NASA only receives 1/10th of 1% of the federal budget. It
should have the budget that it enjoyed in the '60's adjusted for inflation. Obama wants to cancel Orion - Version one to replace space shuttle, version two return Americans to the moon and version three take humans to Mars!.Instead, thanks to the un-American will will have to beg the Russians for a ride to the 'International Space Station' international my foot! It was largely built with American money - when our money was worth something internationally! With it's usual collateral benefits in other areas - unlike other government programs - medicine, solar energy, ion energy, nanotechnology and applications from home to car to office to factory..Once again, there will be a couple of nations in the world in second place but a distant second place. Obama is unwilling to take broken and put in that thing that they use to crush cars. He'll throw good money after bad instead of reorganizing social programs. The red-white-blue will soon be yellow!


HOOKERS AND OTHER THINGS...Hint: December. Santa Claus - more precisely, Saint
Nicholas, who amongst other things purchased 6 hookers from a pimp (or whatever, they
were called about 1600 tears ago. There is no truth to the rumor that he was a party guy.
Although, there is no record of what became of the 6 pros! Catholics - Roman and Orthodox -
are angry with me. Wait a minute, didn't the Pope demote him in the '70's. No compromising
photos surfaced - there was no photography back then. What about the Shroud of Turin.
I don't want to get in trouble was all Christians.
       There were a movie and a sequel in the '40's about Topper and a T.V. series in the '50's.
e people have bad memories and think Topper was the ghost - the ghost were Merriam and George.
       Harvey was a 6' tall invisible rabbit in the movie "Harvey" starring Jimmy Steward in the'40s.
       According to Wikipedia, the Illuminati, "is the name a several groups, both historical and
modern and both real and fictitious." Further, it is rumored that members of this 'secret society'
include Bush and Obama!
      WINNERS CAN COLLECT THEIR PRIZES OVER THE WEEKEND!!!

Fwd: AGING





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To:
Sent: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 7:54 pm
Subject: AGING

                            "When I went to the Bar as a very young man,
                             (Said I to myself - said I),
                             I'll work on a new and original plan,
                             (Said I to myself - said I)."
                                                                                    -W.S. Gilbert

                            "I remember my youth and the feeling that will never
                             come back anymore-that feeling that I could last for
                             ever, outlast the sea, the earth, and all men the
                             deceitful feeling that lures us on to perils, to love, to
                             vain effort - to death; the triumphant conviction of
                             strength the heat of life in the handful of dust, that
                             glow in the heart with every year grows thin.
                             grows cold, grows small, and expires---and expires
                             too soon, to soon---before life itself."
                                                                                 -Joseph Conrad
         
                           "I must reluctantly observe that two causes, the
                            abbreviation of time, and the failure of hope will
                            always tinge with a browner shade the evening of life."
                                                                                 -Edward Gibbon

        

TOOTING MY OWN HORN!

The Best of DePersio continues...DePersio scoops a judge!



-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 10:17 pm
Subject: TOOTING MY OWN HORN

                                     by rickcosmos (aka Richard DePersio)
Recently, former judge, Napolitano stated on Fox News that states should begin considering
invoking "Nullification Doctrine." An idea first suggested by this writer in an article five months ago and discussed with  members of New York State Senator Marty Golden's and New York
Congressman's Michael McMahon's staffs on more then one occasion to increase probably
that it got to the senator and congressman themselves. I'm fairly confident that it did: probably,
to their regret, they know me now; persevere: keep emailing and phoning your representatives
in government and they will come to know you whether they like it or not - make them hear you!).
       I was pleased to discover that my state senator had completed a bill calling for a Constitutional Convention and planning to submit it this fall (your writer was sent a copy of the whole bill and unlike members of the U.S. Congress actually read it and endorsed it in one of his articles). Both approaches are necessary for restoring powers taken from the people and
from the states in spite of Amendment 10 in the Bill of Rights. States have the power to do it
but never have but Constitutional Conventions have been called by the U.S. Congress to add
amendments to the Constitution (Obama and company are doing it with out a convention and
should be impeached but that want happen because Obama is a liberal democrat and most
democrats who control congress are liberals). And, you can easily see why they wouldn't
call for a convention to reduce their own powers which is why we must go back to the policy
of U.S. Senators being chosen by state legislators (as it was prior to 1917) and they were
more committed to the interests of their home states in real not political terms. Read about the
"Nullification Doctrine (which this writer likes even better) for yourself - - - I can't do all the work!!!!
       A number of experts and politicians are talking about reducing college from 4 to 3 years due to the high cost.I started talking about it in 1993. I stated that colleges would be taking in  less money but it would encourage more younger people to attend college - it would balance out. I further talked about: 1) too much in the way of core requirements in colleges which recover and slightly expand upon material that students should have learned in elementary and high school - they should be more like degree programs advertised on T..V. by vocational and
technical schools where you can earn a B.A. in 3 years and an A.A. in 1 1/2 years
because they focus on major and minor; B) high school should be 3 years for bright and
well behaved students and elementary school 7 instead of 8 years. Just think with these
students graduating younger they will be more inclined to attend college and graduate school
too! Something, we need as we fall behind students in other post-industrialized nations and
even some industrialized nations in education. 
      Of course, liberals would oppose it: stupid, smart and well-behaved, smart but incorrigible
or educationally lazy and those with mental and/or physically impairments must share the same classroom. Hold back our best and brightest. Don't discriminate and show favoritism
to those our nation will most need; don't reward hard work and good behavior. Redesign programs for the stupid and the smart but educationally lazy so that they'll want to go to school and contribute to society (they aren't college material) and won't wind-up on social services and dependent on government. Just the way liberals want them! They'll become productive members of society - just the way liberals don't want them!
     John Stossel, formally at ABC and now at FOX Business pointed out last year that in
most public high school classrooms one-third of students have their heads on their arms while
they sleep, one-third are chatting and the final one-third are struggling to hear the teacher!

Fwd: Ooh L`a L`a





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 4:33 pm
Subject: Ooh L`a L`a

Editor's Note: Linda Kessler is a published poet. A sampling of her work can be found at www.poetry.com
She composes poetry and prose. She was gracious enough to allow RICKADDSITE to post three of them. Here is the first:


Oh, what he does to me when he makes love to me
He makes me come alive, I won't quit now
You really get a hold on me
Oh, when he touches me
Ooh L`a L`a

It's like kittens purring, rolling and rolling around
In catnip for hours at a time
And when he kisses me
Ooh L`a L`a

It's like fireworks that never stop
And when he tell me, he loves me
The world stops because by then I'm going out of my head
He makes love to me and he blows my mind away
Ooh L`a L`a

Then again, he stares at me, intoxicates
The eye kisses me, makes love to me
My toes curl and my knees freeze
Ooh L`a L`a

Fwd: BIG NOTE

Editor's Note: Recently, Obama cancelled Orion leaving Russia, the EU, Japan and India in the competition to establish a moon base. America is out of the race. Of course, we won in 1969 when Americans became the first humans to walk on another
heavenly body - the moon!



-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Apr 4, 2009 3:29 pm
Subject: BIG NOTE

         Dear CyberFriends,
         If I can't  get though to you here, I can catch you in another universe via the Einstein-Rosen bridge
(worm-hole) or a curvature of the space-time foam. I think that I'll take the foam being the bridge charges a
toll and I'm cheap!
         Three cheers for Mrs. Oboma! The western European press is offended: she didn't curtsy to the queen
and touched the queen's back. Her protocol was correct. We American's don't bow or curtsy to royalty. We  fought a Revolutionary War to get free of a king. Yet, most prominent Americans (politicians, businessmen and diplomats)
do.Most Americans don't know that your not suppose to applaud after the National Anthem. Touchy/feely. Are
they afraid that some her blue blood might rub off!
        Appropriately, she left the bowing to her husband. He 'bowed' to old Europe: the presidents of France and
Germany! Mr. President, allow me to explain: the U.N., Nato, the G2o, and the Eu are useless. I have a
questions, Mr. President: Why are liberals ashamed of their country and always apologizing for it? (although,
last year, the first lady said that she was proud to be an American for the in her life); why did you lie about
President Bush without mentioning his name - I knew who you were referring to (bad form; Bush never lied
about or critiqued his predecessor - the head of an administration of multi-scandals); do you plan on creating
a world government? Conspiracy nuts have been claiming for years that organizations like Skull and Bones
and the Freemasons which have members of various political stripes have been in the process of doing
just that. I always consider such people to be crackpots. Now I'm beginning to wonder. Mr. President,
would you turn American foreign policy over to the U.N.? Are you thinking of creating a one-world currency?
Do you believe that every country's (including ours) should have their federal reserve bank, department of the
treasury anbs security and exchange commissions get permission from new international economic and
financial bodies?
        Why must we pay 25% of the U.N.s budget? Why do we pay 95% of the cost of protecting western
Europe - why must they suckle on our financial nipple?! Why do you let the Europeans blame us for
the international financial/economic crises. It is not the fault of Americans like me but democrats like Clinton and
Frank. By the way, last week your boss, Mrs, Polusi had a slip of the tongue in a speech, she referred
to fagard Barney nFrank as Mrs. Frank. Could you imagine if a republican had done that? The liberal
mainstream media would have had a field day! Double standard. They are in the slander game. The destroy
via lies and rumors real conservatives with presidential potential: Haig in the '80s; Quall in the '90s;
Pallin today.
        My crystal ball predicts for next year: continued recession of economic depression or mild recovery but
with hyper-inflation. I'm out of here...
                                                                                                    Climbing Aboard the Orion,
                                                                                                     Space Cadet, Rick

Fwd: Smile





-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2009 3:32 pm
Subject: Smile

       Dear Fans,
       A Harris poll in 2001 indicated that Jesus Christ was the most admired man (?) in America. This year
President Oboma was chosen. He was heartened by the fact that Americans chose the same man again!
I am confident that are other president (Polusi) will will be chosen as the most admired female.
       Please bear with me as I get a few more odds and ends out of the way before I get to today's mon-
umental topic. Please be patient. I momentarily have forgotten it (it's what to expect when unlike others
your A.D.D.ed)
       In a recent article, I stated that...by the way, this isn't the topic...we were moving from being a
religious/capitalistic nation to being a secular/socialist nation. I wish to change my position slightly: we are
becoming a communist nation (in practice not theory. The democrats will fast-track illegals - the good and
the bad ones - to citizenship and want them to be able to bring over their parents, under- and over-age
children, their aunts, uncles and cousins. Legal immigrants and new citizens can't do most of those things.
Crime pays - - - for democrats that is. Over 2/3 of the estimated 50 millions are expected to register
democrat. There's more: and it's still not on today's topic ( I do hope it doesn't prove to be anti-climatic).
Welfare to Workfare...In 1996, republicans forced Billy-boy to sign welfare reform. He didn't want to do it;
he didn't want do it. He and his party didn't care for it. And, all the time you knew; and all the time you
knew it. When it worked, he took the bows. Since it was passed millions of able-bodied people have chosen
to wave goodbye to social services because of the way republicans wrote the bill. Their proud was restored.
Presidents Polusi and Oboma have restored the good, old, traditional program (and your going to pay for it!).
Why? Democrats have a vested interest in keep people poor - most of them vote democrat. Bleeding heart
liberals my bad foot. It's politics. The mainstream media depicts conservative-republicans a cold and callous.
Why? We don't toe (my bad feet again) the line: we don't want to throw good money after bad when it
comes to failed liberal programs. We want new approaches to helping the truly need. Like parental choice
(school vouchers): regular public schools; more public magnet schools and magnet programs inside of
regular public schools; private school; home schools; and more non-union public charter schools (the
problem with public schools a lack of money - - - charter schools receive less government funding and their kids
out perform regular public schools kids. If limo-liberals can grant choice (46 chromosomes at conception defines
a human) to murder why can't they give the same choice that they enjoy to the non-working poor, the
working poor and the lower middle class - and it won't cost the taxpayers and the regular public school
one red penny. Liberals in general and unions in particular destroyed the public school system, the
airline industry and now the auto industry. They want to perpetuate the vicious cycle of grandparents,
parents and children on social services and they want this children to grow-up and be on the public dole
and vote democrat. Government social programs are a hand-out while faith-based programs are a hand-up.
The presents says that he will continue President Bush's faith-based programs but without the God
component which makes these programs successful! Don't give me the 'separation of church' argument.
It doesn't exist in and legal document - it was invented by a philosopher (his name escapes me, as well
as, today's topic) in the 1880s. The hell with the poor. Why don't the democrats take them out of their
misery and abort them!?
       I believe that congratulations are in order. I remember today's topic. I'd prefer that you remember me
in your wills. Without delay; post-haste; with no further a do. Smile! Smile! Smile! as you watch your
hard earned money spent by big brother. Watch as the roads are repaired. Watch the corruption. Watch
as good money and thrown at failing public schools.Watch as money is spent on silly, pet projects of
politicians. Watch as the streets are cleaned for you'll soon by sent to the cleaners. Watch as
democrats continue to receive campaign contributions from semi-independent federal agencies like
Fannie Mae. Watch the bureaucratic waste. Watch as your taxes go through roof thanks to their
beneficence. Don't worry about the democrats for the bother to pay their taxes while they get high
positions in the Oboma administration - positions that will be beyond the reach of the poor for most
remain so, Watch! Watch! Watch!...
                                                                                             As Your Pockets are Picked,
                                                                                             Putin